From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <023101c385a1$378ca960$b9844051@insultant.net>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <331a35e5f9d4b8aabb95e6e7c3e3675e@caldo.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:16:35 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 520ecab4-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Forsyth" <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits


> > everyone has said about the limitations of import /mail/box but I don't
> > see the current SMTP-based systems lasting a whole lot longer ...
>
> i used to think that about XML
> then again, there aren't whole conferences about SMTP
> so you might be lucky.

XML what a mess [reaches ...]