From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <026f01c44f46$5fec6750$61fa7d50@SOMA>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <40C8A583.7000504@gmail.com> <015201c44f19$ef973f60$61fa7d50@SOMA>
	<4e24f2fa040610122567fb2f87@mail.gmail.com>
	<01bc01c44f21$207a2f50$61fa7d50@SOMA>
	<4e24f2fa040610124443467e41@mail.gmail.com>
	<01da01c44f24$68899300$61fa7d50@SOMA>
	<4e24f2fa04061013231be0e279@mail.gmail.com>
	<020101c44f2c$bc7758f0$61fa7d50@SOMA>
	<4e24f2fa040610142416558b6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] freebsd v. plan9 - profile results (long)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:55:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9b67b1de-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

for whatever reason, i tested the AVL tree thing on a
sony VAIO [coma]: 400Mhz, 64Mb, PII using kfs
with a vanilla install.

this is what time(1) found:

    23.14u 3.40s 143.71s [rio]

    22.57u 1.67s  31.21r [/dev/null]

    23.13u 3.28s  70.50r [rio]

obviously, output to rio is gonna be expensive.  so what?