From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0272172953cb2dcf6c93bb1d5146cb58@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Sun,  7 Mar 2010 20:06:32 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <5937e294943fc35ce992feeb9962d064@ladd.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] (no subject)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e25e8d3a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> really?  you haven't even tried it and your trying
> to fit it into a whatever-netbsd-does shoebox?

Well, I do have some idea on how fgb's contrib is meant to work and,
yes, I do look at it from a biased perspective :-) Surely you don't
think that is implicitly flawed logic?

After all, how familiar are you with the NetBSD package system?  Fgb's
contrib is not too different, although it is certainly more relaxed,
in my opinion out of historical necessity.  Again in my opinion the
additional flexibility makes it harder to categorise packages and such
categorisation would be of greater benefit.  But it is just an opinion.

++L