From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <029a01c4023d$a80ecf60$8201a8c0@cc77109e>
From: "Bruce Ellis" <brucee@chunder.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <200403042218.i24MIRFI059560@adat.davidashen.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fp stack overflow -- hypot
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="KOI8-R"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri,  5 Mar 2004 10:08:47 +1100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 15be0966-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

i just discovered that the ape hypot and the libc hypot
are different, and the ape one does in fact blowup.
i'll look into a bit more.  good that you tracked it down
this far.

brucee
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Tolpin" <dvd@davidashen.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 9:18 AM
Subject: [9fans] fp stack overflow -- hypot


> 
> The offending function is hypot(2). If I replace it with sqrt(p*p+q*q),
> no more stack overflows no matter what are shapes and how complex the graph
> is.
> 
> I think it is a compiler bug. But need more time or someone's help.
> 
> David