From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] emacs vs plan9
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:53:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02bb01c41f1c$66993b00$19d37d50@SOMA> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404101026370.11106-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
> emacs is kind of a poor man's lisp machine for those who remember such.
that reminds me of the vi(1) [editor] turing machine.
> Emacs could run under plan 9, plan 9 can not run under emacs. I guess I
> think of one of these as a superset of the other, guess which one :-)
could you port plan 9 to the vi(1) turing machine?
;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-10 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-10 6:11 David Tolpin
2004-04-10 6:32 ` Rob Pike
2004-04-10 7:41 ` David Tolpin
2004-04-12 1:54 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-04-10 16:28 ` ron minnich
2004-04-10 16:53 ` boyd, rounin [this message]
2004-04-10 16:55 ` Russ Cox
2004-04-12 2:14 ` ron minnich
2004-04-10 18:19 Keith Nash
2004-04-12 2:16 ` ron minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='02bb01c41f1c$66993b00$19d37d50@SOMA' \
--to=boyd@insultant.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).