From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <02fb01c385b7$e6620a00$b9844051@insultant.net>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309271639250.7260-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> <20030928101050.J27821@cackle.proxima.alt.za> <020001c3859e$d209f220$b9844051@insultant.net> <20030928114226.L27821@cackle.proxima.alt.za> <029701c385b0$686b32e0$b9844051@insultant.net> <20030928134701.P27821@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:58:56 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 52d7af42-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Why bother?

at the time i had a small concern about virii turning up in the dynamically
loadable microcode.