From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za (Lucio De Re)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:26:14 +0200
Subject: [9fans] Forks of Plan 9 (Was: 9vx instability)
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5hOUDAN+PzSLYy8KQ0gEsQ93ccLSbNj_A=RLFwZVnAVQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <031ff0897d69bfcce4a1d22ab6557599@proxima.alt.za>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 47693882-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> A timely discussion before producing any code is usually more profitable.
> 
Unarguably.  But a code review system makes sure that lack of
discussion is corrected before it is too late.  And prior discussion
seems pretty scarce around Plan 9.  Unless of course IRC is where it
all happens, in which case I guess I just don't qualify to comment.

> On 25 November 2011 08:06, Lucio De Re <lucio at proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>> And Code Review ought to be at the core of it.