From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <033d01c2ff75$68107240$644cb2cc@kds> From: "David Butler" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> References: Subject: Re: [9fans] java MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:24:37 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8e31a49a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > > is currently anybody porting java? > > Well, if they are, let's get them to stop! I started this once, a long time ago, and I have to agree with Ron, it had to be stopped. Java as a language is not all bad. But, for Java to be useful to those that *know how to program in Java*, requires the class libraries, including the ones that support the computing environment and networking. This is the VERY BAD part. Java virtualizes a POSIX "computer" with "socket" networking. Why would one want this anywhere near Plan 9? I thought of ripping that stuff out and replacing it with the Plan 9 equivalents, but then it would not be "Pure Java" and would be unusable. Linux is the perfect platform for Java. If you want the network language type thing that Java promises (but hasn't delivered), then you want Limbo and Inferno from www.vitanuova.com. David