From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <03d3164dfc8f3c0275c748dab301d995@9netics.com> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] secstore plain text dilema From: 9nut@9netics.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:22:37 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: e9b56062-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 How about just porting the TLS device to drawterm? (not that adding factotum support wouldn't be useful) As an aside, as brucee and I think rsc have mentioned here before, porting TLS should be straightforward. I plan to look at it in my 2 days= a week + nights working on Plan9, but I currently have more pressing fires to hold my feet to. If someone does this in the meantime, as a token of my appreciation, I will send him/her a bottle of R=C3=A9my Marti= n XO and a box of fine cigars when the mods are accepted back into sources. > Sure. >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> 2/ (message/rfc822) [inline] > To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu > Subject: Re: [9fans] secstore plain text dilema > From: Richard Miller > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:01:16 0000 >=20 > Would it make sense to incorporate a local factotum into drawterm? >=20 > -- Richard