From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:34:30 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <03d884c4f9001407aa9e61c4ceb5c050@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=fPQ0iM2jTN97EA1PnBR06zQv0UxB6WhmRz6q2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101115032531.GB27578@opal.ai.ki>
	<AANLkTimYpajcVoFPVVRGnWqVaaO8vH4y7NGnCc+UAh7k@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikkxwva0SM+V+GQeFnpTw2Rn568+5YSwfziBwn2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=fPQ0iM2jTN97EA1PnBR06zQv0UxB6WhmRz6q2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p vs http
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 80d84dd4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The option is to make servers obey R order for Ts with same tag - just
> as Russ (right?) proposed elsewhere on the list.

no.  tags have no order and clients are specificly disallowed
from having multiple messages with the same tag outstanding.
again, see intro(5).

the option is to issue many Tread/Twrite messages concurrently,
say from the mount driver.  not all file servers will be able to deal with this,
so it'd need to be a mount flag.

- erik