From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <041101c383cd$800a5140$b9844051@insultant.net>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030926103508.00b193e8@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> <5.1.1.6.0.20030926111030.00aa8fb0@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> <5.1.1.6.0.20030926124141.00b15230@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> <03d001c383c9$76da77c0$b9844051@insultant.net> <3F7390CA.3000806@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9fans-ego-wars?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 03:28:32 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4e35c7bc-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> could a cache miss cache be classified as a "feature
> request/enhancement" bug?

iirc kre wrote one for the 4.2 BSD namei, so typos wouldn't
cause a zillion instructions to get executed just to return ENOENT.