From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:12:40 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <045296d6974340cd430fef473e61facb@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <2eea45de-bf51-43cd-86c1-9e3c84156b17@gmail.com>
References: <CAK4xykW=teSxNXrT_ZA_xPsn6V5LT_utbMXTaY6aw1uk2A_G6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<2eea45de-bf51-43cd-86c1-9e3c84156b17@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] i'm afraid we've had it wrong
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 82972706-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun Sep 29 23:00:29 EDT 2013, asbrasbra@gmail.com wrote:
> However stating that "just works" equals "don't rework it" is very Microsofty, tho'

also debatable wrt sockets.  in 1992, it was not possible with sockets to
add an address family without changing all the user programs that intended
to use it.  calling that "it just works" may be a stretch.  part of the reason
one still sees line items that say "works with ip6".

- erik