From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 00:03:09 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <04891bb0d6c90b9ad927c933160a3df5@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <a7da0139aa96cc7db4ca3c14a688ed9c@rei2.9hal>
References: <a7da0139aa96cc7db4ca3c14a688ed9c@rei2.9hal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] formatting the manual from plan9 ports?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9586b4c2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue May 29 23:48:31 EDT 2012, cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote:
> short hardcoded paths are an advantage. this is not linux. this
> is plan9. there are rules. the kernel already provides a way for
> indirection that works for *everything*. mount/bind and private
> namespaces.

while this is all true, and i agree with you, the problem at hand it
to get things formatted on linux.

- erik