From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <04b52efdd21eaaa9b28e114aa55517f6@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] xcpu fix for Plan9.c
From: Kenji Okamoto <okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:29:02 +0900
In-Reply-To: <19b649e3b3fee86d4c20cf4f7187feb7@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9ff0ceae-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> the danger of your example /bin/sh execution.  Now, I think why
> you chose that way.   So, in xcpu we should do only batch job, right?

As usual 
s/Now, I think/Now, I think I understand/

Sorry

Kenji