From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <04cf01c17792$8663c2e0$b6f7c6d4@cybercable.fr>
From: "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@fr.inter.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <200111271956.TAA08841@localhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Nagle algorithm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:26:13 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2bd5b9c2-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> All true. I was thinking more of just nailing the ones that happen
> to cause the most hassle and ignoring the rest, including when you
> get those protocols on other ports. Very little work, easily
> configurable. Whether it would have any effect is a different matter.

Yes and I would just turn off Nagle -- end of problem :)

This ignores 'the rest' where 'the rest' == all.

A lot of work has gone into 'fixing' TCP.  As Living Colour said,
we should just:

    Leave It Alone

    http://www.masadsign.nl/llama/Lyrics/stain.html#03