From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:04:56 -0400
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <05948a9d9d9f1f13bee83958e57eeeb1@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <b8a35f69ab79f870999d18338e67c47e@proxima.alt.za>
References: <b8a35f69ab79f870999d18338e67c47e@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Distributed Pipelines
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0f197a1a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Apr 27 00:33:52 EDT 2010, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> > What about some mounting/binding hackery where you replace
> > /dev/cons so that the original "cpu" command works?
>
> I was going to suggest using UDP instead of TCP or IL. Is that a silly
> idea?

cpu/rx require a stream protocol.  udp will not do.

- erik