From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 18:23:18 -0700
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <05b5b73cd8087388181bc2442e3ab02c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <1633104b58522769b9fa2792ef99aa13@felloff.net>
References: <1633104b58522769b9fa2792ef99aa13@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 510d4494-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun May 10 14:36:15 PDT 2015, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote:
> how is this the opposite? your patch shows the tcb->mss init being removed
> completely from tcpincoming().
>
> - 	/* our sending max segment size cannot be bigger than what he asked for */
> - 	if(lp->mss != 0 && lp->mss < tcb->mss) {
> - 		tcb->mss = lp->mss;
> - 		tpriv->stats[Mss] = tcb->mss;
> - 	}
> + 	/* per rfc, we can't set the mss any more */
> + //	tcb->mss = tcpmtu(s->p, lp->laddr, lp->version, lp->mss, &tcb->scale);

i haven't updated the patch.

- erik