From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <060008d17dc9d5acc8afc6045f4e68fc@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Sun,  1 Jul 2007 07:21:14 -0400
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] URI scheme for 9P2000 resources
In-Reply-To: <20070701091505.GZ28917@kris.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8ea4b9e2-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> But my point was that any protocol other than TCP or unix would 
> seem to go unused, and break consistency with other URI types 
> (none that I know of allow you to name a protocol). If there 
> comes a time when it's a must, something (as suggested) like 
> this:

i think you've invented a new symmetry for uris that no one else
expects or depends on.

i would think that on a unix-like system local connections would
be more useful than tcp.

the symmetry with 9p dial strings would be broken.  that is something
that is depended upon.

- erik