From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <061701c459f1$0f409e60$08fa7d50@SOMA>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <e207e6e2919e77c62863069a80f63e21@davidashen.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] qunlock
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:42:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: abc15968-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> The implementation of qlock/qunlock allows to unlock when not locked;
> I am asking whether it is by design or by a coincidence?

i'd say design.  unlocking things that are not locked is a BUG.