From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0622f200b5499034af164cc235fa8d95@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] chmod +t
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:14:47 -0800
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <161fdb3045375f100d54981867c53bcb@swtch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ff9b4cc6-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> newer fs like ramfs know about the 't' bit, so i assume that the
>> following is due to kenfs.
>> 
>> term% chmod +t xxx
>> chmod: can't wstat xxx: wstat -- unknown bits in qid.type/mode
> 
> the t bit is not implemented by the old file server.
> it is not implemented by ramfs either, but no one told ramfs.

that's good to know; the current behavior in each case seems to
be appropriate.