From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0669e049cdcabfcf19a270d184d94fe1@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] I appear to have stumped the brains at chacha.com
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:17:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180710161105m4111eb2gb25d0efaaeda0056@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d1f5f364-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> ps: limiting that number from below is left as an exercise to the reader :)

my feynmann, we can further limit this number from above by noting
that we likely do not have 10^8 processors/person.  100 seems like
a reasonable upper bound.  that would leave us with a "mere" 10^11
processors tops.

:-)

- erik