From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <06b601c558a2$6e533420$aafb7d50@kilgore> From: "boyd, rounin" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> References: <72cca6a6583b9c78a245f4825fa65229@proxima.alt.za><14ec7b1805051401384dc36d2@mail.gmail.com><14ec7b18050514014012d4e1fe@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] silly dhcpd question Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:31:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4bbd7b8e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > I'm much happier requiring that the ndb entries be stored > in canonical form than doing magical rewriting under the hood. this was my decision too, after a bit of squiz at the problem and not wanting to break canonical interfaces or anything else for that matter. > But then it will be weird that dom is case-insensitive but bootf > is not. Should fs be case-sensitive? Etc. and lots of questions like the above. i didn't feel i was in a position to decide. -- MGRS 31U DQ 52572 12604