From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <06f1ad52e5ad37b3c402aae3d5cdfb79@centurytel.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Ownership settings on a second KFS
From: "Skip Tavakkolian" <fst@centurytel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon,  9 Sep 2002 13:46:40 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7c354f0-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> It makes sense that each additional kfs for additional drives will need
>> its own /adm/users at the root of the filesystem it handles. Is there a better
>> way to supply this other than copying it from the initial kfs at startup?
>
> I don't think so.

Although it would make sense because of uniformity (why should the
first disk be any different to kfs than the second, etc.) notice that
I didn't say I liked it ☺

>
>> Binding to the first /adm does seem to work.
>
> I think you're imagining that.  Kfs doesn't
> know anything about bind, so it can't see the
> binding you introduce.
>

I miss typed. I meant to say "does NOT".