From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <070f01c45a1c$db4a4bc0$08fa7d50@SOMA>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <71c3fdee35f530673fe504e36d037dfc@davidashen.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fscons bug
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:55:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ac34a80a-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> >> cpu% con -l /srv/fscons << EOF
> > 
> > how is con supposed to know that it should wait for some output
> > from the transaction?
> 
> OK. I don't understand something basic.

yeah, con exits when reading fd 0 returns EOF, which will be
pretty ricky-tick on a here document.

RTFS