From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:16:01 +0000
From: Frederic Bonfanti <frederic.bonfanti@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <071fbc37-176c-411c-84e9-c24bfa623dd4@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <93544c96-cd39-478e-8881-4e81bfaf8bf6@googlegroups.com>,
	<20120824165417.4086dc39@wks-ddc.exosec.local>
Subject: Re: [9fans] SOEKRIS
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b35a382a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

THX

After porting it to Inferno, ethervt1605m.c works as expected on net5501

Nevertheless, I have doubts that DP83816AVNG of net4501 is properly supported by Plan 9 driver; modern 9load crashes (MAP VA PA issue) at early stage whilst ported ether83815.c with Soekris support doesn't show better result.

I'll try again later on if time available [...]. Any hint, feedbak net4501 + ether83815 + recent 9load & kernel are most welcome.

+F

On Friday, August 24, 2012 8:24:17 PM UTC+5:30, David du Colombier wrote:
> > Does anybody know what is drivers status regarding latest n/w
>
> > chipsets on Soekris boards?
>
> >
>
> > Is VT6105M for the NET5501 now fully supported?
>
>
>
> I have a Soekris net5501 with eight VT6105M interfaces
>
> and it works fine.
>
>
>
> > I am asking this because I have a bunch of them (recent boxes) but
>
> > could not initialize n/w properly under Inferno Native.
>
>
>
> I haven't tried Inferno, but they are properly supported on Plan 9.
>
>
>
> > So my question is this: if any is relevant, which ..../etherXXXX.c
>
> > has to be ported to Inferno in order to make it happen again?
>
>
>
> /sys/src/9/pc/ethervt6105m.c
>
>
>
> --
>
> David du Colombier