From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0761223355d8f8c71233c6e78c05814d@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Dual CPU on Tekram P6B40D-A5
In-Reply-To: <0dd59a976e026752b5ffb7a90dc5d73b@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:48:16 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 94027196-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed Nov 26 04:42:40 EST 2003, okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp wro=
te:
> I'm now using dual Pen III 550MHz with old Tekram motherboard
> (P6B40D-A5), and writing this mail from that terminal.
>=20
> I recall that it was not so stable before on the same machine.
> The only one difference is that I updated the board's BIOS to
> the newest=E2=98=BA one, version 1.07.
>=20
> Anything has been updated of the Plan 9 kernel for this kind of=20
> dual CPU terminal from ,say, about two years ago?
>=20
> Kenji

I don't think any changes have been made in thhe MP codein that
timeframe. Many other changes have been made, what was the nature
of the instability?