From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:19:54 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <077224d1d36e483d3b889fa59b82013b@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <742996df49091dc9dde2338eeaa6b407@proxima.alt.za>
References: <742996df49091dc9dde2338eeaa6b407@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 dircp
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d96ae84c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Apr 17 08:12:42 EDT 2014, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> I fond that dircp behaves erratically regarding ownership of the
> target files.  Is this expected or should I be looking for a possible
> culprit to eliminate?

mkfs does a better job than dircp, and it handles incremental updates.
i'd like to see dircp replaces with mkfs.

- erik