From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:11:19 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <07bfa71d157645d2ea43560aa8534d81@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <73bd2d5fa0bc8d5c3cfeaef1872e1eee@quintile.net>
References: <73bd2d5fa0bc8d5c3cfeaef1872e1eee@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] (no subject)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d4bc6b6a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Apr 25 03:43:36 EDT 2011, steve@quintile.net wrote:
> I don't manage 1920x1080 but I do get 1600x1200x16 from my
> NVidia GeForce2 MX-200. This card is old but its what is in the
> machine and its works.
>
> I must say lots of pixels makes a very nice interface.

i thought i responded to this.  i run the same resolution in
vesa mode on this

; pci 1002/9714
1002/9714
	ATI Technologies Inc RS880 [Radeon HD 4290]

this sucker supports
vesa mode           0x1e5 1920x1440x16 r5g6b5 direct
vesa mode           0x1e6 1920x1440x32 r8g8b8 direct

but my monitor isn't that good.  i also run with intel
integrated graphics on an atom motherboard.

- erik