From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <08a934ccf7e865e2355a2196f1943bee@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] QTCTL?
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2007 14:16:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8FB74D5A-05FB-4827-A564-770449B933DE@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e48e596c-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The problem is that the clients with higher latencies badly need to  
> be able to cache. And the ones with better latencies can afford not  
> caching :)

the irony is, the higher the latency, the greater the cost of syncronization.

- erik