From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <09146464332bbe55c007f20f5fa09b5b@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme, rio workalike available in plan 9 ports
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <2aa78de3278c853c61d44511e705f1e7@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:03:34 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 62604842-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> The interesting question is whether mk, unlike make, can be shell
> agnostic.  If I specify SHELL=/usr/bin/perl and supply perl recipes,
> will mk cope more or less invisibly?

I meant, in this theoretical situation where SHELL= determines which
shell to use, of course.

++L