From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <0923EE8C-D874-4910-8FCD-AD7A265E8B03@9srv.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:22:31 -0500
References: <2225996.gtUr9J9EkY@krypton>
In-Reply-To: <2225996.gtUr9J9EkY@krypton>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] FUSE on Plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 364da964-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Dec 12, 2014, at 05:49, Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Would this theoretically work? The advantage of FUSE is access to a number=
 of=20
> popular file systems (most notably ext4, NTFS, ZFS) and also many special-=

> purpose file systems.

It's been a few years since I really looked at fuse, so I could be misrememb=
ering things, but wouldn't you then have the port the individual plugs into e=
ach system anyway? Fuse gives you an interconnect, but not all of that funct=
ionality automatically. It's narrower then NDIS, which is nice, but I don't k=
now how much it's going to buy you on its own.=