From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0973949af160bf78da86cf7a6b4b4cd2@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2009 16:27:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4f34febc0902021322x12767a07rcffdbe8d1c349438@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Pegasus 2.6 is released
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9263e038-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>>  You're missing the beauty of 9p. Who needs dynload() when you have mount()?
>
> Mount allows me to add new names to the process namespace.  Dynload
> allows me to call functions or access data in a library that is not
> known to the process (e.g., scripting language interpreter) until
> runtime.  They solve different problems.

there is no fundamental reason they could not solve the same problem.
why are you so keen to remove the rpc?

- erik