From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <09df9b2e5f6c9f2e600201fc413ad12e@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Threads: Sewing badges of honor onto a Kernel
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
In-Reply-To: <200403010934.i219YNhh064852@adat.davidashen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon,  1 Mar 2004 10:02:34 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 067ecde6-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>languages. Finalised cannot be a feature of a class in a hierarchy,
>>since finalized is a state of an object after it was deleted and it
>>is only needed to define the semantics of the language, not to

``[the programmer has] the ability to declare classes or methods as "final". [they cannot
be overriden in a subclass].  The language guarantees that the actual method invoked on
the object is the {finalised method} [my {}] which was written for that class...''

it was that sense i meant, not object destruction.