From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <0A0FF5E0-7544-49CE-A119-50F406D70FA7@9srv.net>
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BCD85B5.1060404@tecmav.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-57--732921915"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:05:37 -0400
References: <4BCD85B5.1060404@tecmav.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fossil robustness
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0ad83522-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--Apple-Mail-57--732921915
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Both fossil and kfs seem like the wrong tool for your job. In
addition to the robustness questions, they (especially fossil)
include features you're not going to get anything out of in
your environment. If you use something like paqfs(4) or
sacfs(4) (not sure which is more appropriate) you'll get
safer operation and have a smaller system as well.


--Apple-Mail-57--732921915
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
	name=PGP.sig
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvN0NEACgkQyrb52b5lrs7wTQCfQhzmsoHpZn9lTq/BK/qx143K
g7cAn1vubszhr98dNK/+Nambf0jSGkad
=fLwY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail-57--732921915--