From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) From: Bakul Shah In-Reply-To: <5cff6c39f36c28829ae14b075b7192d1@proxima.alt.za> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:48:08 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0DC16139-2F69-413F-A707-05A16FB4CE44@bitblocks.com> References: <5cff6c39f36c28829ae14b075b7192d1@proxima.alt.za> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] c++ Topicbox-Message-UUID: e42aa962-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Nov 22, 2012, at 10:12 AM, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote: >> I remembering finding Iverson's book "A Programming Language" quite = interesting. >=20 > I don't remember the book any more, but I did read the library copy in > its entirety, maybe even more than once and was thrilled when the > university almost accidentally got an APL interpreter from Univac for > their 1106. It got me into real trouble with the cycle counters, it > was expensive to run and interactive time was even more expensive. At school I had a part time job with a cancer epidemiology group (associated with the same school). I used up so much of their "funny money" at the school computer center (all IBM computers with expensive compute time) by using APL, I had to drop back to using PL/I for them! The thing is, you make far fewer mistakes in APL but they can cause a lot more damage! I wonder if the financial "quants" made such mistakes in 2008 :-) > Today it is just a topic for nostalgic conversation, but it really > made a difference to me, it was as if a switch had been thrown in my > head. Iverson's papers are still very useful when programming in APL2 or languages like k, j or q.=