From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0EE74ABC-E79F-477B-9F26-37EB1BDF21AA@telus.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Lalonde Subject: Re: [9fans] Bay Area Plan 9 Users Group Meeting (August '07) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:37:50 -0700 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 99795f9e-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (think I (was gorka correct)) On 31-Jul-07, at 7:35 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> either grouping (well-behaved dogs) and interns or well-behaved (dogs >> and interns) >> in a rather ambiguous way. Can we bring bad-behaved interns?. >> >> The "and" is redundant in the presence of the "et" in the "et >> cetera", >> unambiguously meaning >> that there is a grouping or class of equivalence being defined. >> Though I am not a native english speaker though, so I might be wrong. >> >> Back to the assembler... > > you'll do better with a language that uses parens to good effect. ;-) > > - erik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGsAAOpJeHo/Fbu1wRAmqeAKDTrNvTBhldc61P/2TxqHJxC6AYHACgul8F dLiYnOTBYVxBYzJ5iRJSArM= =3Ti5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----