From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <0a82a6715f128c6bc4ba5f0159dd16ba@plan9.bell-labs.com> From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] adm vs bootes In-Reply-To: <9f2938e55b5a406c40d7726f37c3a10f@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-xmgqotfcagtenosnqhpockwzzu" Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:34:12 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 97453f8c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-xmgqotfcagtenosnqhpockwzzu Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit adm is not really special in fossil, it's the owner of various files created internally (e.g. snapshots). however, best not to use it for general things, it may become more special over time as we fix problems, add fetures, bugs, etc. --upas-xmgqotfcagtenosnqhpockwzzu Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Tue Nov 25 08:38:31 EST 2003 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Tue Nov 25 08:38:29 EST 2003 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 84C5C19BCF; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:38:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.18.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 1B0E619BC8; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:38:13 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id CE89F19BCF; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:37:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com (plan9.bell-labs.com [204.178.31.2]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 04EAC19BDA for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:36:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <9f2938e55b5a406c40d7726f37c3a10f@plan9.bell-labs.com> From: David Presotto To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] adm vs bootes In-Reply-To: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479CB3@black.aprote.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw" Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:36:49 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On ken's old file server and kfs, the user "adm" was quite special. One couldn't authenticate to the file server as "adm" for example. In that case, I think it would be a bad idea. On fossil, I don't think that there's anything special about "adm". Jmk or rsc may correct me. --upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Tue Nov 25 08:25:35 EST 2003 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Tue Nov 25 08:25:32 EST 2003 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 76C4619B66; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:25:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.18.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 10EEE19B9B; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:25:12 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id D87FE19B77; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.aprote.ee (ns.aprote.ee [80.235.78.106]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5AE2219B62 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:23:59 -0500 (EST) Received: Message by Barricade ns.aprote.ee with ESMTP id hAPDNpd8016323 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:23:51 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479CB3@black.aprote.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [9fans] Shutdown service Thread-Index: AcOzVfx8qtUMAntNQTKRSrDcXBHhzQAAUmJQ From: "Tiit Lankots" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: [9fans] adm vs bootes Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:23:55 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Is it a bad idea to make adm the auth server owner? Tiit --upas-klybanpacasxdowiaddgverciw-- --upas-xmgqotfcagtenosnqhpockwzzu--