From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0b1c493be42d4ca71dcb8864209060a0@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:52:15 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8c padding problem
In-Reply-To: <68f8eb08905533341341b17b21c8dcc7@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 202d3312-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> i am guessing that the requirement of being able to demote a type to
> one of its anonymouse constituents -- as in Node to Lock in Ken's example --
> would require a uniform layout that makes it easy to calculate the offset.

however this is the opposite case.  the padding is after the
anon. structure.  the anon. structure itself is at offset 0.

- erik