From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <0b7eb0d85ea7f59c0455f9bcbf044c2d@terzarima.net> From: Charles Forsyth Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:49:49 +0000 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-iqsbawbgovqzhlkwjonsvpglof" Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6ac124b0-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-iqsbawbgovqzhlkwjonsvpglof Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit can it compile a working pm? --upas-iqsbawbgovqzhlkwjonsvpglof Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by lavoro; Sat Mar 1 05:26:22 GMT 2008 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id F1F161C815 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:23:52 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3EF9C1C7EC for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:23:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25296-01-3 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:23:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from treacle.proxima.alt.za (virtual.web.proxima.alt.za [192.96.32.135]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 235991C7E5 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 00:23:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from treacle.proxima.alt.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by treacle.proxima.alt.za (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m215N8cm028262 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:23:08 +0200 (SAST) Received: (from root@localhost) by treacle.proxima.alt.za (8.13.6/8.12.11) with UUCP id m215N7Z1015358 for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:23:07 +0200 (SAST) Received: from plan9.phyrql.alt.za (foible.phyrql.alt.za [192.168.32.134]) by myrtle.proxima.alt.za (8.11.3nb1/8.11.5) with ESMTP id m214t9201892 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 06:55:09 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 06:55:06 +0200 From: lucio@proxima.alt.za MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=terzarima.net@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=terzarima.net@cse.psu.edu Before I apply some serious effort to bring P9GCC in line with the latest release, I'd like to convince myself that the effort is worth it. I'm keen to catch two birds with one stone: (a) make sure that version 3.0 is sufficiently functional and (b) determine how useful it really is. Please will anybody who has a Plan 9 objective that can only be attained using GCC/G++ please drop me a line to let me know briefly what it is? If the whole exercise gets a lot of support, I'll happily set up more infrastructure to deal with it (wiki, blog, remote access, whatever Bell Labs would rather not do themselves). ++L PS: I prefer if you use the 9fans list, I may miss your mail if I haven't already have entered your sender address in my whitelist. Use your discretion. --upas-iqsbawbgovqzhlkwjonsvpglof--