From: mycroftiv@sphericalharmony.com
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: [9fans] Plan 9 professional engineers, tear up your NDAs!
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:13:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bfc0f124a88ffad55c76f21d2cbccca@sphericalharmony.com> (raw)
> As disruptive as they really are, the patents and
> NDA are not a culprit here.
> Plan 9 suffers from small hobbyist community.
This was exactly how I analyzed the situation myself - until I
randomly stumbled on United States Patent 8,380,765 for multi-pipes,
which completely changed my perceptions on this issue.
There is really no way to describe the fury and offense I feel at this
patent for an implementation McIlroy's original free pipe/array
concept as a synthetic fs of pipe-like files.
If I was a totally different kind of person, I could probably try to
file software patents based on my own work, since everyone knows its
just a matter of getting implementations of basic principles done in a
slightly new way and getting the patent put together so that its
specific enough to squeak by in comparison to other pre-existing
patents, but general enough to be used as a weapon against people
doing things which are merely similar. That's why you pay the big
bucks to the lawyers. I am not a lawyer, I am a law professor's son,
and he spent 30 years explaining to me exactly how the game works.
I was only vaguely batty before I discovered that "muxing pipes as a
9p fs with a granular control interface" as an implementation of
McIlroy's original concept for freeform grids and processing arrays is
something that IBM has now patented.
I highly doubt this patent is a lonely island in the sea. I would
imagine that there are plenty more basic ideas in computer science
which can be redone as a 9p fs and then patented again. The HARE
paper claims that one of the successul goals of the project was
raising the profile of 9p in the scientific community.
I have absolutely zero clue what Plan 9 related patents might be -
pardon the phrase - in the pipeline, but I think that the potential
growing relevance of 9P for commercial distributed applications might
have a lot to do with why we don't see more posts from people doing
work in that area.
Ben Kidwell
"mycroftiv"
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-17 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-17 11:13 mycroftiv [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-17 11:44 mycroftiv
2013-03-17 12:30 ` vvs009
2013-03-17 12:47 ` vvs009
2013-03-17 10:27 mycroftiv
2013-03-17 10:48 ` vvs009
2013-03-17 15:37 ` erik quanstrom
2013-03-17 16:24 ` vvs009
2013-03-17 16:43 ` hiro
2013-03-17 7:06 mycroftiv
2013-03-17 8:53 ` Richard Miller
2013-03-17 10:31 ` vvs009
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bfc0f124a88ffad55c76f21d2cbccca@sphericalharmony.com \
--to=mycroftiv@sphericalharmony.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).