From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0c6a01c0e0db$66222fb0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
From: "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@planete.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <20010519234657.4A6FC199C1@mail.cse.psu.edu> <3B073602.5B439C05@princeton.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Worm consumption (was: Re: tracking file modifiers)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 05:17:28 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a33b83d0-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

From: "Martin Harriss" <martin@Princeton.EDU>
> You might consider having a separate "scratch" file system not backed up by
> a WORM.  Anything transient you put in scratch.  Anything precious you put
> in the WORMed file system.

that's such a bad idea.  the current design gives you that for free
if the mem/mag caches are large enough.  why complicated it?