From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0c8f430361127927ddb4af6cef5a5c94@rei2.9hal>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:24:36 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <CAL4LZyjOmGSQ+WKryFQUiGC_iSnu24paGL4EYt9=LYmgqNPrVA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] a disk filesystem for both Plan 9 and Linux?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 07142e12-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i think fat is still the best option, even tho it has these limitations.
virtually every operating system can deal with fat, and the implementations
are robust and tolerant to errors because they are pretty much expected.

ext2srv doesnt support jurnaling.

--
cinap