From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0cb45ce1a91a4430636e0be90e9d12cc@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
In-Reply-To: <00b301c428f1$1ec6f040$48db7d50@SOMA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:52:23 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6927d2da-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>all the world is not 11271.  /net or /net.alt should be irrelevant.
>>the routing should just work.  it does on lunix and the last time

/net.alt is often used to AVOID having routing between the networks,
which is exactly why someone added a bizarre scheme to xBSD to get a
similar effect to Plan 9's having distinct network stacks on #I0 #I1 ...

reaches for B-52