From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0ce6145379aee5a7383ad3e286b3ae33@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] silly bind quetsion
In-Reply-To: <8340948d82988035a4f4b22ae5e56d72@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:42:44 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 860f31a6-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

i knew there was a reason this seemed weird.
i think the more common way to do this would be

	bind -b /usr/local/386/bin /bin
	bind -a /386/bin/ip /bin/ip

so that /bin is the only directory that ends
up being a union.  the source mkfiles assume
that /386/bin is not a union (install goes into
/$objtype/bin, which doesn't really make sense
when you've got a union).