From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:58:33 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <0ce81c0d523e2d6b9e56042460ec61d6@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK4xykVcGbx937W8f4VBp3vF6YDw2FiEKWW76eoTWrgSVzt0rg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJCwQ3FeaY2yNuSvUgJZvKm+1GMycnLx7DpPWMY5U48pitjZpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJCwQ3HYkPMKtxD9CRtspd=Hmo-jmQF9td_KceBTjpDowohSGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEAzY38LwpZTM0v3hmoRyQWD05TwD4Dpj44bWAigBX3N8bz0-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK4xykVcGbx937W8f4VBp3vF6YDw2FiEKWW76eoTWrgSVzt0rg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC 2013] Implement plan9 commands in Go, Goblin
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4b9a05b6-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Apr 29 15:54:08 EDT 2013, mirtchovski@gmail.com wrote:
> I wish the "goblin" project was used to re-imagine how the old plan9
> commands may be done in a new language, rather than simply rewriting
> the commands almost line-for-line while introducing errors. Take a
> look at basename/main.go -- that functionality is already in package
> "path", why bother? Or cmp/main.go, where we see:

do you envision a system with no shell at all?

- erik