From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0d70c02db88a62a452668951dc985c49@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] cooked mouse mode.
From: "Fco. J. Ballesteros" <nemo@lsub.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:54:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <cb4dc1e8bebc589875941c3e455cf560@vitanuova.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2f50aacc-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> just IMHO, i'd say that having the same channel produce two different
> types of event is at least as open to confusion as having a new

not quite.
You have to say
setmousemode(cooked),
and then no other thread has a way to get to
the raw mouse events.

Also, we'd like not to have different chefs for the mouse.