From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0e16b31d6bdd819c6e2df755028243eb@vitanuova.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:44:46 +0100
From: rog@vitanuova.com
To: csant@csant.info, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] dir tree Qs
In-Reply-To: <op.tefvaxd8d84skq@fiore.malebolge>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a2bd22bc-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> is yet another one confusing me. If /mnt stands for "mount", what does /n  
> stand for?

actually, the main distinction seems to be that /n holds filesystems
that contain regular files, and /mnt has service interfaces.

personally i wouldn't mind losing /mnt - /n is so much easier to type.