From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:25:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e729f108c862316f4357a2874bd90b1@plan9.bell-labs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3281.199.98.20.107.1077754455.squirrel@wish.cooper.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 135 bytes --]
I'm currently building support for it into Plan 9. I think its a
good idea. It doesn't prevent spam but it makes white lists better.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2992 bytes --]
From: "Joel Salomon" <salomo3@cooper.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:14:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3281.199.98.20.107.1077754455.squirrel@wish.cooper.edu>
Geoff Collyer said:
> I've been contributing anti-spam machinery for smtpd, and have some
> other code and ideas stalled by lack of time and not-quite-complete
> IPv6 support in Plan 9. So far none of the strongly-hyped anti-spam
> ideas keep the spam from reaching one's machine in the first place,
> and I know how to do that, it's just going to take some time to do it.
>
Does anyone here have an opinion (yes ;-) ) on SMTP+SPF?
http://spf.pobox.com/ It *claims* to be a sufficient patch on SMTP to
ensure that the sender of an email is a real person from a responsible
ISP.
--Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 18:31 [9fans] Re: new release? chris niewiarowski
2004-02-25 18:59 ` matt
2004-02-26 6:09 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-25 20:34 ` ron minnich
2004-02-25 20:43 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 20:53 ` ron minnich
2004-02-25 20:59 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 21:10 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-25 21:13 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 21:45 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-25 21:55 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 22:39 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 4:36 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-25 22:41 ` 9nut
2004-02-25 22:47 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 23:03 ` David Presotto
2004-02-25 23:50 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 0:14 ` SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?) Joel Salomon
2004-02-26 0:42 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 9:25 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 13:48 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 1:09 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 9:28 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 10:41 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-26 17:43 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 20:03 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-26 21:46 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 22:01 ` Geoff Collyer
[not found] ` <1077840327.5034.5.camel@rea>
2004-02-27 0:08 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-27 0:18 ` C H Forsyth
2004-02-27 0:15 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-28 16:17 ` vdharani
2004-02-26 1:25 ` David Presotto [this message]
2004-02-26 2:12 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 1:50 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-26 2:51 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 6:45 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 8:06 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 8:06 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 8:14 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 8:20 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 12:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 12:35 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 14:42 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 14:15 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 13:21 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 14:46 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 15:09 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 21:12 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 3:42 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 4:36 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 4:50 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 6:51 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 11:27 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 10:39 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 11:58 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 11:16 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 11:24 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 12:37 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 1:36 ` [9fans] Re: new release? Derek Fawcus
2004-02-26 1:44 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 3:49 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-25 23:29 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-25 23:59 ` 9nut
2004-02-25 21:25 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 0:56 ` Brantley Coile
2004-02-25 21:35 ` matt
2004-02-25 22:39 ` 9nut
2004-02-25 22:00 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-02-25 22:05 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 22:39 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-02-26 6:26 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 18:48 ` rog
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e729f108c862316f4357a2874bd90b1@plan9.bell-labs.com \
--to=presotto@closedmind.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).