From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0ebd923c1d135a05a6507c5e0432e6bc@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:12:26 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Ruby port
In-Reply-To: <20071114201649.A3CEE5B3E@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fba798b6-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > Making binutils to grok Plan9 aout is not big and is already been don=
e.
>=20
> So then what is the big problem in porting gcc to plan9?
>=20

you first. =E2=98=BA

- erik