From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <0f9745ee9350aa326ee154ec58824dac@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:41:49 -0400
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Include guards and multiple includes
In-Reply-To: <a9951d2a0610230539o59e57e30vbd05a5676ab81e17@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d2c6b7a2-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

uh, ken did.

- erik

On Mon Oct 23 08:40:40 EDT 2006, rogelio.serrano@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> I think this has more to do with minimising the preprocessor logic. I
> like the plan 9 include tree more than the traditional unix include
> mess. In my programs I dont use macros anywhere. none. nada. zero.
> 
> If one could only get rid of the preprocessor...